SEBI has notified the Real Estate Investment Trusts (Amendment) Regulations 2019 and Infrastructure Investment Trusts (Amendment) Regulations 2019 to reduce the minimum subscription requirement and define the trading lot in terms of number of units of Real Estate Investment Trusts (ReITs) and Infrastructure Investment Trusts (InvITs). It has also released guidelines on the manner of determining the minimum allotment and trading lot size for both these regulations and enhanced financial disclosures InvITs. These amendments are effective from 22 April 2019.
The minimum subscription from any investor in an initial and follow-on offer is Rs.50,000 for units of a Real Estate Investment Trust (ReIT) (earlier Rs. Two lakhs) and Rs 1 lakh for units of an InvIT (earlier Rs. Ten lakhs). The trading lot for both is 100 units. Allotment shall be made in multiples of a lot.
The amended InvIT Regulations also provide for the following important amendments :
(e) the Trustee or investment manager (and not the Sponsor) requests such delisting and such request has been approved by unit holders in accordance with regulation 22 ; and
(ea) the Trustee or Investment Manager of a privately placed and listed InvIT chooses to convert InvIT to a privately placed unlisted InvIT and such request has been approved by unit holders in accordance with regulation 22 . Provided that exit shall be provided to dissenting unitholders.
In case of (ea) above, approval from not less than 90% of the unit holders by value shall be required and exit shall be provided to dissenting unitholders.[sub-regulation (5B) of regulation 22 inserted]. The InvIT may, in such case, retain its certificate of registration and continue to undertake the activity of a privately placed unlisted InvIT.
The increase in the leverage limit from 49% of the value of InvIT assets to 70% of the InvIT assets is a positive for the InvIT industry, as it will allow investment managers to utilize additional borrowings for financing acquisitions or develop new infrastructure assets, as opposed to the expensive and time-consuming process of raising fresh capital from existing or new unitholders each time a new acquisition is identified. However, the amendments to the SEBI InvIT Regulations come with certain conditions, including the requirement for the InvIT to obtain a credit rating of ‘AAA’ or equivalent for increasing the leverage limit beyond 49%. For InvITs opting for leverage levels above 49% of the value of InvIT assets, stability of cash flows will become very critical and will be a crucial component for achieving the ‘AAA’ benchmark.
The regime for unlisted private InvITs seems to be SEBI’s response to the industry’s clamour for providing more flexibility in private InvIT structures. While private unlisted InvITs do allow more flexibility vis-à-vis private listed InvITs, especially with respect to minimum number of investors and the leverage limit, however, the lack of clarity on the tax benefits associated with private unlisted InvITs may make such unlisted InvIT structures unattractive for investors till the time the Government provides clarity over the tax benefits for unlisted InvITs.
This is intended for general information purposes only. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author/authors and does not necessarily reflect the views of the firm.
The Bar Council of India does not permit solicitation of work and advertising by legal practitioners and advocates. By accessing the Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co. website (our website), the user acknowledges that: