The CCI rejected at prima facie stage a complaint by Unilazer Ventures (Unilazer), a film content creation company, that a number of multiplex cinema operators and their association had colluded in relation to the imposition of a Virtual Print Fee (VPF), revenue sharing arrangements, delays in payment and the screening of advertisements/trailers.1 In relation to the imposition of a VPF, a fee paid by a film producer/distributor to film exhibitors to recoup part of the cost of digital projection equipment, the CCI found no evidence of an anti-competitive agreement or understanding; in the absence of concerted activity it was not for the CCI to determine the appropriate fee or the period for which it should be paid.
Disclaimer
This is intended for general information purposes only. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author/authors and does not necessarily reflect the views of the firm.
The Bar Council of India does not permit solicitation of work and advertising by legal practitioners and advocates. By accessing the Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co. website (our website), the user acknowledges that: